Showing the Losses Insurance Doesn’t Cover
Most senior officers realize that accidents cost money; but few understand just how much. One reason so many underestimate the cost of accidents is that they assume that insurance covers all losses. A worker gets hurt? No problem, they think. Workers' compensation will pay for the medical bills and cover the worker's wages during recovery. As a safety coordinator, it's incumbent upon you to puncture this complacency and point out the real costs of accidents. Here's how.
The Costs of Accidents
When an accident occurs, a company incurs all kinds of losses. Insurance covers only a small percentage of them. Most of the costs of an accident are from losses not covered by insurance. So to win support for your safety program, you need to explain the real impact of uninsured losses on the company's bottom line.
To do this, you need to understand that losses related to accidents come in two varieties:
Losses Covered by Insurance. These are the direct costs a company pays for an accident, including the victim's medical bills and wages for lost work time.
- The costs of finding and training a replacement for the victim;
- Overtime and extra wages the company must pay other workers to make up for the victim's lost production;
- Medical costs and payments to the victim not covered by insurance;
- Increases in insurance premiums;
- Delays in production which may also lead to loss of contracts and/or reputation;
- Damage to equipment and other capital assets;
- Damage to morale and decline in productivity that inevitably follow on the heels of serious accidents;
- Time spent investigating the accident; and
- Legal costs and fines.
Uninsured losses are generally at least three times and up to 50 times greater than insured losses, depending on the industry. But senior officers typically overlook these losses. Consequently, they overestimate the financial protection of insurance.
Use Case Study to Shatter Complacency
You need to demonstrate the impact of uninsured losses to your officers so they understand that insurance isn't enough to protect the company. Here's a case study you can use to drive home the point:
A skilled machine operator at a company employing 100 workers averaging $15 per hour gets his sleeve caught in the moving part of an unguarded press machine and hurts his right arm. The machine is shut down, completely stopping production for two hours. All workers get full wages accrued during the two-hour shut-down ($3,000). Morale is shattered and production drops in the two weeks following the accident resulting in a loss of $2,000.
The machine is damaged and needs $10,000 in repairs, slowing production even further. The company must pay 10 workers 10 hours of overtime ($2,250) to make up for the lost time. But it still misses a delivery date causing an angry customer to cancel a contract worth $40,000.
Meanwhile, the victim undergoes extensive surgery. After a 10-day hospital stay, he's released. But he can't return to work for six months. It costs the company $1,000 to find and train somebody to replace the victim. Insurance covers all medical bills (say, $50,000) and 50 percent of lost wages (say, $7,700). When the victim gets back his productivity is 50 percent of what it was before the injury. It takes him another six months to get back up to speed. Let's say this loss in productivity costs the company $7,700.
The government investigates the accident and charges the company with failing to guard the machine. The charge is later dropped because of a technicality, but only after the company runs up $30,000 in legal fees. The company incurs another $10,000 in administrative costs to defend itself. Moreover, the accident and prosecution damage the company's reputation and ability to compete for contracts. Although hard to value, this loss of good will costs the company at least $30,000.
Finally, adding insult to injury, as a result of the accident, the workers' comp carrier raises the company's annual premium $5,000.
Let's consider the total costs of this accident to the company:
| LOSS INCURRED | APPROXIMATE COST |
| Medical Bills | $50,000 |
| Lost Wages | $7,700 |
| Wages to Worker During Shutdown | $2,800 |
| Lost Productivity | $2,000 |
| Overtime | $2,250 |
| Costs to Replace Worker | $1,000 |
| Lost Productivity When Worker Returns | $7,700 |
| Machine Repairs | $10,000 |
| Value of Lost Contract | $40,000 |
| Legal Fees/Admin. Costs | $40,000 |
| Increase in Workers' Comp Premiums | $5,000 |
| Loss of Good Will | $30,000 |
| TOTAL COSTS | $198,450 |
| Insured Costs | $57,700 |
| Uninsured Costs | $140,750 |
Conclusion
The costs of an accident are analogous to an iceberg. All that most corporate executives see are the direct costs - the tip of the iceberg. The indirect costs are buried below the surface and represent the greatest percentage by far. Your job as safety coordinator is to steer your company a course through the icebergs and protect it from "titanic" catastrophe.
![]()
NUCLEAR POWER
An Invitation
I'm no economist. But I know that $4 per gallon gas is not good for the economy. I'm no geologist. But I know that the supply of fossil fuels is finite. I'm no scientist. But I know that sooner or later we're going to have to give nuclear power a second look.
But to quote the question that Laurence Olivier put to Dustin Hoffman in the movie, The Marathon Man - "Is it safe" - Don’t ask me. I know nothing about nuclear plant safety.
However, I’m sure some of you do. So I issue the following invitation to members. Please submit articles to SafetyXChange that set the record straight on nuclear power and the safety of the plants that generate it. Are our fears well grounded? Or are they preventing us from pursuing what seems like one of the few viable solutions to our oil dependency? And what about the potential environmental impact?
Send your thoughts to glennd@bongarde.com. If you wish to submit a feature story, include a brief bio and photo. Thanks everybody. With your help, maybe SafetyXChange can make a difference in addressing one of the world’s most pressing problems
![]() |
| Three Mile Island, 1999: 20 years later |
NUCLEAR POWER
An Accident Chronology
The first nuclear plants opened in 1952. And, over the years, there have been occasions where safety measures failed and accidents occurred. Here's a chronology of some of the significant events:
| DATE | LOCATION | DESCRIPTION |
| 1952 | Chalk River, near Ottawa |
The accidental removal of 4 control rods causes a partial meltdown of the reactor's uranium fuel core. No injuries. |
| 1957 | Windscale Pile No. 1, near Liverpool, UK |
Fire in a graphite-cooled reactor spews radiation contaminating 200 sq. miles of countryside. |
| 1957 | South Ural Mountains |
Explosion of radioactive wastes at nuclear weapons factory in USSR 12 miles from the city of Kyshtym forces 10,000 to evacuate. |
| 1976 | Greifswald,
East Germany |
Failure of safety system during fire causes near meltdown of nuclear plant core reactor. |
| 1979 | Three Mile Isl. Harrisburg, PA | Loss of coolant by one of the plant’s reactors causes partial meltdown, releasing radioactive water and gases. The worst nuclear accident in U.S. history. |
| 1986 | Chernobyl near Kiev, Ukraine |
Fire and explosion in graphite core of reactor spews radiation over USSR, eastern Europe and Scandinavia. At least 31 believed dead. Worst nuclear accident in history. |
| 1999 | Tokaimura, Japan |
Uncontrolled chain reaction in uranium-processing nuclear fuel plant spews radioactive gas into the air, killing 2 workers and severely injuring 1 other. |
| 2004 | Mihama, Japan |
Non-radioactive steam leak from nuclear plant kills 4 workers and burns 7 others. |
| 2007 | Kashiwazaki,
Japan |
6.8 magnitude earthquake causes radiation leaks, fires and burst pipes at nuclear power plant. Later learned that plant had been built directly over an active seismic fault. |
Email This Post
Print This Post
TopLeave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






