<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progressive Discipline and Safety Infractions, Part 2 of 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safetyxchange.org/compliance-risk-management/progressive-discipline-safety-infractions-part-2-of-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safetyxchange.org/compliance-risk-management/progressive-discipline-safety-infractions-part-2-of-4</link>
	<description>Putting Safety First</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7231</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hroberts@env-mgt.com</title>
		<link>http://www.safetyxchange.org/compliance-risk-management/progressive-discipline-safety-infractions-part-2-of-4/comment-page-1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>hroberts@env-mgt.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safetyxchange.org/article.php?id=653#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Several years ago we developed a similar written program on a large construction project where I managed safety.  However, we had a couple of additions that ultimately made the program much more effective.  

1. We had a clause that allowed a written violation notice for a first offense if the infraction exposed OTHER employees to risk.

2. We allowed suspension for a first offense if the infraction was deliberately negligent, or resulted in a &#039;near-miss&#039; or injury.  

3. We allowed immediate termination even for a first offense if it was a clear violation of well-known rules AND resulted in a significant injury.  

4. We required that for a second offense within a work crew, the supervisor had to be formally counselled by the Craft Superintendent; for a third offense he would be cited; and for a fourth he would be suspended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago we developed a similar written program on a large construction project where I managed safety.  However, we had a couple of additions that ultimately made the program much more effective.  </p>
<p>1. We had a clause that allowed a written violation notice for a first offense if the infraction exposed OTHER employees to risk.</p>
<p>2. We allowed suspension for a first offense if the infraction was deliberately negligent, or resulted in a 'near-miss' or injury.  </p>
<p>3. We allowed immediate termination even for a first offense if it was a clear violation of well-known rules AND resulted in a significant injury.  </p>
<p>4. We required that for a second offense within a work crew, the supervisor had to be formally counselled by the Craft Superintendent; for a third offense he would be cited; and for a fourth he would be suspended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

