What You Don’t Tell Your Workers Can Hurt You
When OSHA/OHS inspectors show up at a workplace, the first people they usually encounter are the workers and supervisors (which, for simplicity’s sake, we’ll refer to collectively as “workers”) at the site. What transpires between those workers and the inspector in those few moments can make or break the inspection.
This series will explain what your workers need to know about OSHA/OHS inspections so they can respond appropriately to inspectors’ demands if and when an inspector shows up. At the conclusion of the series, I’ll provide a Model Policy (in the Tools section of SafetyXChange) that you can adapt and use to make sure your workers understand how to protect your company’s and their own rights during an inspection.
Cooperation vs. Self-Incrimination
The start of an OSHA/OHS inspection is a crucial period and one fraught with tension. One false or rude remark by a worker and you might be in for a rough ride. That’s why most companies tell their workers to be courteous and cooperative when the inspector shows up. In fact, there’s a legal duty to extend cooperation to OSHA/OHS officials carrying out inspections.
On the other hand, you don’t want your workers to be too cooperative. Employer and workers have legal rights during inspections. Caving in to—or worse, anticipating—the inspector’s every demand can compromise your legal position and expose you to liability. More than one company has been hit with citations or had their fines increased because their workers “gave away the store,” according to an Illinois lawyer.
You Have the Right to Question Inspectors
OSHA/OHS inspectors are not gods. For example, they can’t just ask for and help themselves to any information they want. Their authority is subject to your rights. The problem is that you need to understand and assert those rights. For example, you might have to turn down an inspector’s demands for certain information the government is not entitled to see, such as privileged audit reports. If you just roll over, you might end up forfeiting your rights.
The Search Warrant Conundrum
Search warrants are a perfect illustration of this. Since 1978, U.S. courts have recognized that OSHA inspectors must have either a search warrant or valid consent to conduct an inspection. You may deny inspectors access to your facility or jobsite until they come back with a search warrant. Some people in the field recommend that you always ask to see a warrant, if for no other reason, to buy a little extra time. Others recommend a less confrontational approach. “They’re going to get in anyway, and the inspection is going to be a lot more comprehensive when they return if you insist on a warrant,” warns a Florida OSHA lawyer.
Ultimately, the employer must decide whether to ask an inspector for a warrant. The fly in the ointment: If you opt for a “let-me-see-your-warrant” strategy, you might have to rely on the workers on the scene to assert that right on your behalf. If you’re not there, in other words, it falls to one of your workers to demand to see a search warrant.
Search Warrants in Canada
In Canada, the rules are slightly different. Generally speaking, provincial OHS laws grant inspectors broad rights to conduct workplace inspections to determine if an organization is in compliance with regulatory requirements. This includes access to the workplace and the right to see and make copies of documents without a warrant.
If, on the other hand, the inspector is there not to conduct an inspection but an investigation, he or she needs a warrant. In contrast to an inspection, an investigation is undertaken in response to suspicion of wrongdoing for the purpose of gathering evidence for use in a prosecution. Since it’s essentially a criminal procedure, it implicates civil rights and liberties under the Charter, such as the right against self-incrimination and the right to a fair trial.
As a practical matter, however, since the same government officials generally have the authority to conduct inspections and investigations, it is often difficult for organizations to determine if they’re being inspected or investigated.
Conclusion
The search warrant is just one example of legal protections and rights that need to be asserted early in the inspection process, and in many cases, asserted by workers on the scene. Next week, in Part 2 of this series, we’ll look at what can go wrong when workers fail to assert an organization’s rights appropriately and how to remedy the problem.
Email This Post
Print This Post
Top
Story Comments (%)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






I just want to clarify the last paragraph of the article with respect to Search warrants and when they are required in Canada..
In Ontario, Canada an investigator does not need a search warrant to undertake an investigation, and employers would be at risk of being charged with hindering and obstructing an inspector if they refuse entry or in some way limit the inspectors investigation.
A search warrant becomes necessary only when an investigator reaches a state of mind where they have "reasonable and problem grounds" (RPG) that an offence has been commited by the employer. In that case the investigator must apply for a search warrant to continue the investigation.
Although it may often seem likely that a conclusion could quickly be reached regarding an offence, and a warrant would be needed, it is the personal judgment of the investigator (subject to court scrutiny) that determines when RPG occurs. For an investigator to reach this state of mind they must have determined and verified the elements of the offence, and all factors that fit into the proof of the violation. This may require statements and evidence from several sources, as well as physical evidence, or testing by an outside party.
Michael Chappell
Provincial Coordinator
Construction Health and Safety Program
Ontario Ministry of Labour